The article is a big set of -opinions- with no true -fact- at support. The actuals -AI- are mainly LLM systems, and are quite far away from being intelligent,

The article is a big set of -opinions- with no true -fact- at support. The actuals -AI- are mainly LLM systems, and are quite far away from being intelligent, but actually -capable- in some areas. The misuse of these (and others) -capable- systems suredly will not save the world, but will probably only help some usual little privileged part of it. Not a single tech will "save" the world, but the meaning of what we make in the world. Tech is a tool, not a goal, and the way -AI- and others tech is described is more close to a goal (or a religion) in itself than one of the tools we must create ad learn to use. Science + Humanity (Compassion? Love? Friedship? chose yours) will help to save something.