3 ms·
There’s a really good case for sentience, though. This isn’t a problem of infinite regression: no one is asking for you to become a Jain.
by 35997279 3y ago
There’s a really good case for sentience, though. This isn’t a problem of infinite regression: no one is asking for you to become a Jain.
- pvaldes 3y agoone law at a time
- horsawlarway 3y agoSure - I won't argue that I emotionally understand and relate much more strongly to the pain and suffering of animals that are biologically similar to me. I also agree that minimizing that pain is a reasonable goal, and worth taking steps to do at most every point we can afford to (and realistically - we are fairly rich as a species, we could be doing better). I don't particularly agree that forgoing meat consumption entirely is the right call - although reducing it likely is (especially if you live in the US). I also don't think that just because you happen to be eating a plant, you're off the hook - I think monoculture production and certain farming practices (see: palm oil) are causing suffering on similar scales. In my opinion - we should be trusting large conglomerates less with our foods (whether they're plant or animal) and doing more production locally. Acknowledging and respecting where the food you eat comes from is a huge step up from where many folks are right now.
- 35997279 3y agoYou’re right on all fronts. I’ll add that there’s a human element to both the plant and meat consumption story: in both cases, harvesting and slaughtering, the dirty work is often done by migrant workers with very little enforced legal protections. They work in terrible conditions, for low pay.