4 ms·
Well I guess I was not very clear with my words then. I didn't say it was a problem for them, and they seem to be perfectly happy at the idea of their big epiph
by LastTrain 3y ago
Well I guess I was not very clear with my words then. I didn't say it was a problem for them, and they seem to be perfectly happy at the idea of their big epiphany coming from LSD. But I wasn't taking issue with that, I believe they believe that. I simply meant the "problem" with ascribing the epiphany to LSD is there is no way to know in an individual case if LSD had anything to do at all with it, because we know very little on that subject at the current time.
- skinnymuch 3y agoWe know very little about a lot. Including things society believes we know a lot or all about. Scientific evidence isn’t infallible or the be all end all.
- di456 3y agoThat's one of the signatures of a psychedelic experience. There's plenty of research on the subject, this study came up on a quick Google search. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsptsci.0c00194 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsptsci.0c00194 > Our position contrasts the idea that subjective effects of psychedelics may be irrelevant to their therapeutic effects. > The meaning and significance attributed to psychedelic experiences has been well established in laboratory settings. Psilocybin administration studies have repeatedly shown that participants frequently rate their psychedelic experiences as among the most meaningful of their entire lives (5,6,8,16−19) and they are sometimes compared to the birth of a first-born child or death of a parent. Due to their salience, such experiences may serve as narrative “inflection points” in one’s life that could provide an impetus for changing one’s identification with certain patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.