3 ms·
I wonder if ClosedAI and other companies use the findings of the open source community in their products. For example, do they use QLORA to reduce the costs of
by behnamoh 3y ago
I wonder if ClosedAI and other companies use the findings of the open source community in their products. For example, do they use QLORA to reduce the costs of training and inference? Do they quantize their models to serve non-subscribing consumers?
- danielbln 3y agoNot disagreeing with your points, but saying "ClosedAI" is about as clever as writing M$ for Microsoft back in the day, which is to say not very.
- loa_in_ 3y agoI'd say saying M$ makes it harder for M$ to find out I'm talking about them in them in the indexed web because it's more ambiguous, that's all I need to know.
- coolspot 3y agoIf we are talking about indexing, writing M$ is easier to find in an index because it is a such unique token. MS can mean many things (e.g. Miss), M$ is less ambiguous.
- rafark 3y agoI think it’s ironic that M$ made ClosedAI.
- smoldesu 3y agoYeah, I think it feigns meaningful criticism. The "Sleepy Joe"-tier insults are ad-hominem enough that I don't try to respond.
- Miraste 3y agoM$ is a silly way to call Microsoft greedy. ClosedAI is somewhat better because OpenAI's very name is a bald-faced lie, and they should be called on it. Are there more elegant ways to do that? Sure, but every time I see Altman in the news crying crocodile tears about the "dangers" of open anything I think we need all the forms of opposition we can find.
- tanseydavid 3y agoIt is a colloquial spelling and they earned it, a long time ago.
- jmoss20 3y agoQuantization is hardly a "finding of the open source community". (IIRC the first TPU was int8! Though the tradition is much older than that.)