4 ms·
"That is OK, right?" The way you are doing it, could maybe be improved. "The problem is, of course, you have no idea if that dose is what caused the change"
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"That is OK, right?"
The way you are doing it, could maybe be improved.
"The problem is, of course, you have no idea if that dose is what caused the change"
You clearly judged here based on little information. How do you know, that he cannot know?
(Unless you argue about philosophical limits of "knowing")
When till time X there was behavior Y and at time X there was a strong trip - and afterwards differences,then it seems pretty linked to me.
- LastTrain 3y agoHey thanks, I'll work on that. You try and work on staying on topic and not making meta comments.
- hutzlibu 3y agoSorry, but that is quite similar. You asked a question and I decided to answer it. No meta comments initiated from my side, as far as I am aware. (I did not take part in the conversation before). So you are not really in a position to tell me, what to do, yet you did. And I am not in a position to tell you, what to do. I merly answered your open question on what I think you could improve. But if you would like a meta comment from me: I think you might benefit from not considering every online discussion as something you have to win. (I have been there as well)