>they should have two formats anyway Good thing JXL has the best progressive support of any image format available! [0, 1] Something which you can only find pa

>they should have two formats anyway Good thing JXL has the best progressive support of any image format available! [0, 1] Something which you can only find partially with incremental decoding in WebP and doesn't really exist in AVIF (just one of the many limitations of being bolted onto a video codec). You might often reconsider having both versions of a file with this capability. (which wasn't exploited much or at all with "dumber" and heavier progressive JPEGs) 0. https://opensource.googleblog.com/2021/09/using-saliency-in-progressive-jpeg-xl-images.html https://opensource.googleblog.com/2021/09/using-saliency-in-... 1. https://jpegxl.io/articles/faq/#doesjxlsupportprogressivedecoding https://jpegxl.io/articles/faq/#doesjxlsupportprogressivedec...?