4 ms·
I don't understand what you're trying to say. The article says that there is no such thing as "learned helplessness". To match what the article says, I can tur
by gjadi 3y ago
I don't understand what you're trying to say.
The article says that there is no such thing as "learned helplessness". To match what the article says, I can turn your example into: when you don't know how to read, reading means nothing. One has to learn to read in order to make sense of the words.
You do not learn to ignore words by reading without knowing how to ("learned helplessness"), you learn to read words.
- technothrasher 3y agoIt's not about having to learn to read. The example the parent poster was making was you already know how to read, but one day find that every book you pick up is filled with nonsense rather than real words. Eventually to stop bothering to try to read anything. That's what they were describing as 'learned helplessness'. The new paper seems to just re-word it as 'learned loss of control'. I don't see the huge difference. Just because the default state on most things is helplessness doesn't mean you cannot learn to fall back into helplessness again. But if the new wording helps with constructing treatment plans for mental health issues, sounds fine enough to me.
- darkerside 3y agoYes, this is well stated. I understand why people write articles thqt lead with a provocative statement, but I think it's important for us all to read between those lines.