> And that still puts the bar higher than “material shot by amateurs with their phones” When I talk about “material shot by amateurs with their phones” I was r

> And that still puts the bar higher than “material shot by amateurs with their phones” When I talk about “material shot by amateurs with their phones” I was referring to independent very low budget movies, the modern version of Peter Jackson's Bad Taste, not videos shot by people at parties, they do not classify as movies IMO. Should we also include in the book category people's personal diaries, internal companies documents, sportsbooks, wedding picture books, school yearbooks, etc.?