3 ms·
Yes, I’m splitting hairs over the semantics perhaps. I think given some of Linus’s LKML rants directed at people who have broken userspace, it’s reasonable to
by denotational 3y ago
Yes, I’m splitting hairs over the semantics perhaps.
I think given some of Linus’s LKML rants directed at people who have broken userspace, it’s reasonable to take the claim at face value and assume that there is a hard guarantee of backwards compatibility (modulo bugs).
- arp242 3y agoI think people sometimes pay a bit too much attention to "random Linus posts/rants on LKML". As far as I've seen, these kind of outbursts were never the default/standard behaviour but the exception, and I believe Linus toned down a bit in recent years. I'm not fan of his outbursts by any means, but you have to see these things in context. Imagine everything you post on the internet will be read by heaps of people and still be quoted years from now. Often my posts on e.g. HN don't express my full nuanced views either, because it's not germane to the topic at hand, because I phrased things badly, and sometimes I'm just dead wrong. No one quotes all the stupid stuff I said 15 years ago though, or the stupid stuff I said yesterday.
- account42 3y agoLinus' rants were usually directed at high-ranking maintainers who really should have known better than to accept those.