4 ms·
> But why a 386? Why not a 486 This question can go on and on though. Why a 486 and not a P1? Why a P1 and not a P2? If I had to guess I'd assume it was purel
by BizarreByte 3y ago
> But why a 386? Why not a 486
This question can go on and on though. Why a 486 and not a P1? Why a P1 and not a P2?
If I had to guess I'd assume it was purely based on part availability, or cost.
- jeffbee 3y agoThe question seems to be why ship Windows95 preinstalled on a platform that can't run it, when highly integrated x86 clones such as the Vortex are available? https://www.vortex86.com/products/Vortex86DX https://www.vortex86.com/products/Vortex86DX
- Lammy 3y agoI assumed that was for the FAT32 and USB support. The stock image just boots up in MS-DOS 7.1 mode and you have to type “win” to go graphical.