4 ms·

"what well known" From what sources? Kiev?

by gdy 3y ago

lovelyviking 3y ago
from many, but you probably would prefer your russian friends speaking half a year ago about planting explosives into the dam. https://nitter.hu/Gerashchenko_en/status/1666061532080361472#m https://nitter.hu/Gerashchenko_en/status/1666061532080361472...
- gdy 3y ago
  I have no idea who these people are, but let's grant you the benefit of the doubt. Don't you think that blowing the dam now was premature and pointless?
  - lovelyviking 3y ago
    >Don't you think that blowing the dam now was premature and pointless? you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me. I do not wish to be part of such discussion. I think there is no a proper time to blow the dam just like I think the whole russian aggression ‘was’ and ‘is’ pointless to begin with. On the other hand there is a lot of dumb idiots in russia who think it was a good idea to start the war against Ukraine. There are also people convinced of having certain level of intelligence and funny enough wish to help those russians in the same time. So you can talk with them and discuss when it is ‘mature’ to blow some dam.
    - gdy 3y ago
      'I do not wish to be part of such discussion' You started it though by retranslating BBC's speculations but back down when merits of blowing up dam are questioned. "I think there is no a proper time to blow the dam just like I think the whole russian aggression ‘was’ and ‘is’ pointless to begin with. " No intention to argue with that, but the dam is blown anyway and somebody did blow it up. It may be blown by Russia, but again it may be not. Take the NordStream comedy -- many actors, starting from Kiev, were trying to blame Russia for the explosions and inventing bizarre reasons for that and look at the headlines now -- 'U.S. had intelligence of detailed Ukrainian plan to attack Nord Stream pipeline' [0]. So who should I talk to about reasons for Russia to blow up NordStream? [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-ukraine-russia/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/...
      - lovelyviking 3y ago
        >You started it though by retranslating BBC's speculation I’ve corrected BBC speculation. No discussion with russian lies. > It may be blown by Russia, but again it may be not. Here we observe the essence of such posts. Very in-line with inventing as much versions as possible. Poor performance though. I wonder if there have been any studies regarding how helping russian propaganda affects sleeping quality of those who practice it. Perhaps try to go with this version: ‘Most likely Harry Potter was involved … after all he was seen on some bridge and was throwing something … ’
        gdy 3y ago
        So what about Russia blowing up Nordstream?
        lovelyviking 3y ago
        Here again you express great enthusiasm about plans of blowing something up and just as before you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me.
        gdy 3y ago
        It was blown up in September. You comment doesn't make any sense, but that's not too surprising.
        lovelyviking 3y ago
        Unfortunately the discussion with you lost any sense long ago when you have ignored provided link and tried to deviate toward typical russian propagandist narrative. Since russian propaganda does not make any sense at all it was hard to expect that you would be genuinely interested in such thing as ‘sense’. Anyway, sorry to disappoint. Just as before you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me. I am sure they will be more than happy to share obsession with improving plans and reasoning behind blowing something up. Their lies will most likely make ‘sense’ to you and there you might find some excitement and surprises you are possibly looking for.

"what well known" From what sources? Kiev?

by gdy 3y ago

"what well known" From what sources? Kiev?

from many, but you probably would prefer your russian friends speaking half a year ago about planting explosives into the dam. https://nitter.hu/Gerashchenko_en/status/1666061532080361472#m https://nitter.hu/Gerashchenko_en/status/1666061532080361472...

gdy 3y ago
I have no idea who these people are, but let's grant you the benefit of the doubt. Don't you think that blowing the dam now was premature and pointless?
- lovelyviking 3y ago
  >Don't you think that blowing the dam now was premature and pointless? you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me. I do not wish to be part of such discussion. I think there is no a proper time to blow the dam just like I think the whole russian aggression ‘was’ and ‘is’ pointless to begin with. On the other hand there is a lot of dumb idiots in russia who think it was a good idea to start the war against Ukraine. There are also people convinced of having certain level of intelligence and funny enough wish to help those russians in the same time. So you can talk with them and discuss when it is ‘mature’ to blow some dam.
  - gdy 3y ago
    'I do not wish to be part of such discussion' You started it though by retranslating BBC's speculations but back down when merits of blowing up dam are questioned. "I think there is no a proper time to blow the dam just like I think the whole russian aggression ‘was’ and ‘is’ pointless to begin with. " No intention to argue with that, but the dam is blown anyway and somebody did blow it up. It may be blown by Russia, but again it may be not. Take the NordStream comedy -- many actors, starting from Kiev, were trying to blame Russia for the explosions and inventing bizarre reasons for that and look at the headlines now -- 'U.S. had intelligence of detailed Ukrainian plan to attack Nord Stream pipeline' [0]. So who should I talk to about reasons for Russia to blow up NordStream? [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-ukraine-russia/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/...
    - lovelyviking 3y ago
      >You started it though by retranslating BBC's speculation I’ve corrected BBC speculation. No discussion with russian lies. > It may be blown by Russia, but again it may be not. Here we observe the essence of such posts. Very in-line with inventing as much versions as possible. Poor performance though. I wonder if there have been any studies regarding how helping russian propaganda affects sleeping quality of those who practice it. Perhaps try to go with this version: ‘Most likely Harry Potter was involved … after all he was seen on some bridge and was throwing something … ’
      - gdy 3y ago
        So what about Russia blowing up Nordstream?
        lovelyviking 3y ago
        Here again you express great enthusiasm about plans of blowing something up and just as before you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me.
        gdy 3y ago
        It was blown up in September. You comment doesn't make any sense, but that's not too surprising.
        lovelyviking 3y ago
        Unfortunately the discussion with you lost any sense long ago when you have ignored provided link and tried to deviate toward typical russian propagandist narrative. Since russian propaganda does not make any sense at all it was hard to expect that you would be genuinely interested in such thing as ‘sense’. Anyway, sorry to disappoint. Just as before you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me. I am sure they will be more than happy to share obsession with improving plans and reasoning behind blowing something up. Their lies will most likely make ‘sense’ to you and there you might find some excitement and surprises you are possibly looking for.