3 ms·

>The confidence of this assertion is at odds with the what is currently known It is unclear what you mean by ‘known’. Known to whom? To you? To BBC? If it’s

>The confidence of this assertion is at odds with the what is currently known It is unclear what you mean by ‘known’. Known to whom? To you? To BBC? If it’s not known to you or to BBC it doesn’t mean it’s not known. It means it’s not known to you or/and BBC. The title I provided is not at odds to what is known to me. >.. and in-line with the war of narrative, another fiercely contested front of this conflict. It is in-line with what well known about the dam construction and russian preparations to blow it more than half a year ago already. It would be interesting to see you analyse your own efforts here to see how much they are ‘in-line with the war of narrative’ > I wonder what the second order effect this will have … well, possibly some people would prefer to dwell into entertaining philosophy and contribute to creation of right amount of fog to hide the truth and own ignorance.

gdy 3y ago
"what well known" From what sources? Kiev?
- lovelyviking 3y ago
  from many, but you probably would prefer your russian friends speaking half a year ago about planting explosives into the dam. https://nitter.hu/Gerashchenko_en/status/1666061532080361472#m https://nitter.hu/Gerashchenko_en/status/1666061532080361472...
  - gdy 3y ago
    I have no idea who these people are, but let's grant you the benefit of the doubt. Don't you think that blowing the dam now was premature and pointless?
    - lovelyviking 3y ago
      >Don't you think that blowing the dam now was premature and pointless? you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me. I do not wish to be part of such discussion. I think there is no a proper time to blow the dam just like I think the whole russian aggression ‘was’ and ‘is’ pointless to begin with. On the other hand there is a lot of dumb idiots in russia who think it was a good idea to start the war against Ukraine. There are also people convinced of having certain level of intelligence and funny enough wish to help those russians in the same time. So you can talk with them and discuss when it is ‘mature’ to blow some dam.
      - gdy 3y ago
        'I do not wish to be part of such discussion' You started it though by retranslating BBC's speculations but back down when merits of blowing up dam are questioned. "I think there is no a proper time to blow the dam just like I think the whole russian aggression ‘was’ and ‘is’ pointless to begin with. " No intention to argue with that, but the dam is blown anyway and somebody did blow it up. It may be blown by Russia, but again it may be not. Take the NordStream comedy -- many actors, starting from Kiev, were trying to blame Russia for the explosions and inventing bizarre reasons for that and look at the headlines now -- 'U.S. had intelligence of detailed Ukrainian plan to attack Nord Stream pipeline' [0]. So who should I talk to about reasons for Russia to blow up NordStream? [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-ukraine-russia/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/...
        lovelyviking 3y ago
        >You started it though by retranslating BBC's speculation I’ve corrected BBC speculation. No discussion with russian lies. > It may be blown by Russia, but again it may be not. Here we observe the essence of such posts. Very in-line with inventing as much versions as possible. Poor performance though. I wonder if there have been any studies regarding how helping russian propaganda affects sleeping quality of those who practice it. Perhaps try to go with this version: ‘Most likely Harry Potter was involved … after all he was seen on some bridge and was throwing something … ’
        gdy 3y ago
        So what about Russia blowing up Nordstream?
        lovelyviking 3y ago
        Here again you express great enthusiasm about plans of blowing something up and just as before you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me.

gdy 3y ago

"what well known" From what sources? Kiev?

lovelyviking 3y ago
from many, but you probably would prefer your russian friends speaking half a year ago about planting explosives into the dam. https://nitter.hu/Gerashchenko_en/status/1666061532080361472#m https://nitter.hu/Gerashchenko_en/status/1666061532080361472...
- gdy 3y ago
  I have no idea who these people are, but let's grant you the benefit of the doubt. Don't you think that blowing the dam now was premature and pointless?
  - lovelyviking 3y ago
    >Don't you think that blowing the dam now was premature and pointless? you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me. I do not wish to be part of such discussion. I think there is no a proper time to blow the dam just like I think the whole russian aggression ‘was’ and ‘is’ pointless to begin with. On the other hand there is a lot of dumb idiots in russia who think it was a good idea to start the war against Ukraine. There are also people convinced of having certain level of intelligence and funny enough wish to help those russians in the same time. So you can talk with them and discuss when it is ‘mature’ to blow some dam.
    - gdy 3y ago
      'I do not wish to be part of such discussion' You started it though by retranslating BBC's speculations but back down when merits of blowing up dam are questioned. "I think there is no a proper time to blow the dam just like I think the whole russian aggression ‘was’ and ‘is’ pointless to begin with. " No intention to argue with that, but the dam is blown anyway and somebody did blow it up. It may be blown by Russia, but again it may be not. Take the NordStream comedy -- many actors, starting from Kiev, were trying to blame Russia for the explosions and inventing bizarre reasons for that and look at the headlines now -- 'U.S. had intelligence of detailed Ukrainian plan to attack Nord Stream pipeline' [0]. So who should I talk to about reasons for Russia to blow up NordStream? [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-ukraine-russia/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/...
      - lovelyviking 3y ago
        >You started it though by retranslating BBC's speculation I’ve corrected BBC speculation. No discussion with russian lies. > It may be blown by Russia, but again it may be not. Here we observe the essence of such posts. Very in-line with inventing as much versions as possible. Poor performance though. I wonder if there have been any studies regarding how helping russian propaganda affects sleeping quality of those who practice it. Perhaps try to go with this version: ‘Most likely Harry Potter was involved … after all he was seen on some bridge and was throwing something … ’
        gdy 3y ago
        So what about Russia blowing up Nordstream?
        lovelyviking 3y ago
        Here again you express great enthusiasm about plans of blowing something up and just as before you should probably discuss it with your russian friends. Not with me.