I don’t think your list is particularly well compiled. For starters, bar your “functional” group, you’ve not grouped them by paradigms. Which has meant you’ve l

I don’t think your list is particularly well compiled. For starters, bar your “functional” group, you’ve not grouped them by paradigms. Which has meant you’ve left out some pretty significant classifications. And several languages haven’t even been grouped correctly using your own method (or at least the lack of established terminology makes it harder to understand the grouping context behind each category, since most languages exhibit multiple traits and influences).