Again, I don't see you reprimanding lesuorac, who committed the initial violation: Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone say

Again, I don't see you reprimanding lesuorac, who committed the initial violation: Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. He deliberately reduced "decades" to 5 elections for the express purpose of weakening the argument and making it easier to criticize ("sample size of garbage").