3 ms·
No, they didn't. They told the general public one thing, and told the moderators a significantly different thing in private, via a confidential moderator-only
by JdeBP 3y ago
No, they didn't. They told the general public one thing, and told the moderators a significantly different thing in private, via a confidential moderator-only communications channel. This put the moderators in the position of having to act in accordance with a secret policy and contrary to what the public policy said, which would make it seem that the moderators were the ones at fault when people pointed that out.
- wilg 3y agoSince this is not mentioned in the open letter about the strike, I have to conclude that what you are talking about is not the reason for the strike.
- JdeBP 3y agoYour reading skills need significant improvement. It's the 6th paragraph of that letter; and also mentioned in many individual explanations such as https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/20324/43344 https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/20324/43344 . Then there are https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389814/167145 https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389814/167145 and all of the comments at https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/167145 https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/167145 .
- wilg 3y agoCorrection: Since this is not mentioned until the sixth paragraph in the open letter about the strike, I have to conclude that what you are talking about is not the main reason for the strike.