4 ms·
Section 230 had nothing to do with it. Offering usenet retention is the same thing as being a common carrier. Section 230 would only come in to play if you acti
by ok123456 3y ago
Section 230 had nothing to do with it. Offering usenet retention is the same thing as being a common carrier. Section 230 would only come in to play if you actively moderated your usenet retention to prohibit perfectly legal speech.
- krapp 3y ago> Section 230 would only come in to play if you actively moderated your usenet retention to prohibit perfectly legal speech. https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act/ https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referre...
- ok123456 3y agoWhat is your argument?
- krapp 3y agoSorry, I thought you would actually read it, forgot where I was for a second - Section 230 protection doesn't require a platform to act as a "common carrier" or to only moderate strictly illegal content, so it would not "come into play" under the circumstances you described.