> The title of this article is rather assertive. Take it as a proposition to be debated [...] The main immediate goal is [...] to spur a fruitful discussion to

> The title of this article is rather assertive. Take it as a proposition to be debated [...] The main immediate goal is [...] to spur a fruitful discussion to advance our understanding beyond the "Wow!" effect. OK, I already know where this is going so I'll just skim the rest. Hmmm... as I suspected, I can't see how this article is any different to: "AI Does Not Help [xyz]" with cherry-picked examples to prove a point. In fact, I'm pretty sure I've been reading similar articles several times a month since ChatGPT was released. Here is my "proposition to be debated": "Articles about how AI does not help [xyz] do not in fact help anyone"