7 ms·
Can't it be enabled via an extension? Similar to how media players support third party codec.
by pacetherace 3y ago
Can't it be enabled via an extension? Similar to how media players support third party codec.
- iamakulov 3y agoNot really. AFAIK (correct me if I’m wrong!) first-party and third-party codecs in media players are kinda equal: you load a file, and the media player picks which codec to delegate that file to. You can’t do that in with a Chrome extension – the extensions can manipulate HTML and run custom JS, but that’s more or less it (plus some basic browser-level stuff like work with tabs and intercept network requests). This doesn’t mean an extension isn’t possible at all – eg there’s https://github.com/zamfofex/jxl-crx/ https://github.com/zamfofex/jxl-crx/ that detects JXL images and decodes them with JS – but that’s slower. Plus the bigger issue is adoption. You want all users to get your JPEG XL images, not just the 0.1% of users that installed the extension.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- computerbuster 3y agoIt can be, but not perfectly. Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/jxl/?utm_source=addons.mozilla.org&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=search https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/jxl/?utm_sour... Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/add-jxl-support/khacgjhalljalcbfehknlagpjgjcgoej https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/add-jxl-support/kh...