> Imagine if in the early days of Photoshop a law had been passed to require notification that an image was edited. Every image we encounter today would have to

> Imagine if in the early days of Photoshop a law had been passed to require notification that an image was edited. Every image we encounter today would have to contain that warning text. You say that as some sort of gotcha, but there is a law like this in France - all images used in advertising/public context that were edited should clearly state so. And why not? They're practically lying (false advertisement) otherwise, making the person better looking, the food more appealing/thinner, the "taken by our amazing camera" photos better etc.