4 ms·

While the content sounds good, the context is off. Here's the top domains of the first page of Google results when you Google this officer's name: debrief.org

While the content sounds good, the context is off. Here's the top domains of the first page of Google results when you Google this officer's name: debrief.org, nysun.com, dailystar.co.uk, dailymail.co.uk, the-sun.com, brobible.com, ar15.com, dailywire.com, m4carbine.net These are the same sites I would expect to see blurry pictures of Big Foot. Unless we're assuming that the Department of Defense is capable of suppressing every major news outlet?

david-gpu 3y ago
The authors of the article are Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal, the people who broke off the news about the secret US program to study UFOs on the New York Times back in 2017 and 2018. The other journalist that has interviewed the whistleblower is Ross Coulthart, the award-winning investigative journalist who published interviews with Nat Kobitz, former US Navy Science and Tech Director, who claimed to have knowledge of a program to reverse-engineer crashed UFOs. The people who are breaking these news can't be dismissed easily.
- speakfreely 3y ago
  So New York Times, where Ralph worked for 45 years, was not interested in this story? They also mention the Washington Post did not run it, claiming they "needed to publish quickly" without explaining why they couldn't wait for WaPo to authenticate it.
  - graderjs 3y ago
    It's not just not the mainstream media onto it. Even the dedicated UFO gatekeepers haven't touched it yet. I think that indicates that: it's factional, and it's a new faction.
    - graderjs 3y ago
      Paraphrasing this guy: "The story is bigger than Snowden. It's just breaking and mainstream media have had a month lead on it, been approached, but refused. It should have people writing to their representatives to investigate Gursch's allegations. People should be outraged at the criminal activity that has gone on outside of oversight. Media is complicit so far." https://youtu.be/rQjbFZT9_EM?t=1370 https://youtu.be/rQjbFZT9_EM?t=1370
King-Aaron 3y ago
On one hand, I thought the same initially, that all the sources seem like typical tabloids. On the other hand, it may be that more 'trustworthy' organisations are doing some level of due diligence before republishing this. If nothing surfaces in the larger outlets in the next 24-48 hours it probably is just the first thing.

david-gpu 3y ago

The authors of the article are Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal, the people who broke off the news about the secret US program to study UFOs on the New York Times back in 2017 and 2018. The other journalist that has interviewed the whistleblower is Ross Coulthart, the award-winning investigative journalist who published interviews with Nat Kobitz, former US Navy Science and Tech Director, who claimed to have knowledge of a program to reverse-engineer crashed UFOs. The people who are breaking these news can't be dismissed easily.

speakfreely 3y ago
So New York Times, where Ralph worked for 45 years, was not interested in this story? They also mention the Washington Post did not run it, claiming they "needed to publish quickly" without explaining why they couldn't wait for WaPo to authenticate it.
- graderjs 3y ago
  It's not just not the mainstream media onto it. Even the dedicated UFO gatekeepers haven't touched it yet. I think that indicates that: it's factional, and it's a new faction.
  - graderjs 3y ago
    Paraphrasing this guy: "The story is bigger than Snowden. It's just breaking and mainstream media have had a month lead on it, been approached, but refused. It should have people writing to their representatives to investigate Gursch's allegations. People should be outraged at the criminal activity that has gone on outside of oversight. Media is complicit so far." https://youtu.be/rQjbFZT9_EM?t=1370 https://youtu.be/rQjbFZT9_EM?t=1370

King-Aaron 3y ago

On one hand, I thought the same initially, that all the sources seem like typical tabloids. On the other hand, it may be that more 'trustworthy' organisations are doing some level of due diligence before republishing this. If nothing surfaces in the larger outlets in the next 24-48 hours it probably is just the first thing.