4 ms·

23M for both eyes doesn't seem that far off from Meta Quest 2 Pro at 9.3M (2,160 x 2,160 x 2). And Meta Quest 2 Pro is one year old at $999.

• zimpenfish 3y ago
  > 23M for both eyes doesn't seem that far off from [...] 9.3M It's almost 2.5x the pixels [edit: was ~~resolution~~ which is incorrect]. How is that "not far off"? It's more pixels per eye than the MQ2P has for both!
  • makomk 3y ago
    2.5x the pixels is more like 1.5x the resolution in terms of the smallest features that can be seen - remmber that displays are two-dimensional and in order to halve the width of the smallest discernable detail like say a line you need to double the pixels in both directions for a total of four times as many pixels. On the other hand, it is going to be close to 2.5x the rendering cost.
    • zimpenfish 3y ago
      Ta, edited my post to correct it to pixels instead of resolution.
  • hartator 3y ago
    MQ2P has super blurry texts though. It's hard to take think 50-60% bump up the resolution will be enough.