3 ms·
Evidence in real life is accumulative, not "holy grail style", like in the movies. You build a case step by step, systematically establishing a context. Here yo
by Loquebantur 3y ago
Evidence in real life is accumulative, not "holy grail style", like in the movies.
You build a case step by step, systematically establishing a context. Here you already missed all the prior foundational work.
On top of it you pretend to be able to judge the validity of "artifacts". That is mere posturing.
You miss the slightly more important point of having been lied to your entire life by the government about fundamental topics, which is beginning to unravel here.
- lisasays 3y agoEvidence in real life is accumulative, Right -- and so far there's an accumulation of precisely zero. On top of it you pretend to be able to judge the validity of "artifacts". I defer largely to (legitimate) experts, actually. But as of yet: there are no artifacts to evaluate.
- Loquebantur 3y agoDoes the account nradov belong to you as well? You not knowing about the already existing evidence is no proof of its inexistence. What "legitimate experts" exactly are you referring to and where? The whistleblower here is talking, among other important things, about a secret US military program attempting to reverse engineer non-human artifacts. Your demands here are out of context and nonsensical.
- lisasays 3y agoI might as well be the Queen of Romania as far as you're concerned. And hey, you can believe whatever you want about this stuff. I really don't care. I do find most of the line of discussion here to be quite silly, though.
- LargeWu 3y agoTo be fair, though, the claim here is "intact vehicles". That's as holy grail as it gets.
- kwertyoowiyop 3y agoLet’s see one, then.