3 ms·
Isn't this something trivially resolved by the fact that the union members will be the researchers who can decide how to organize themselves? If they feel that
by EatingWithForks 3y ago
Isn't this something trivially resolved by the fact that the union members will be the researchers who can decide how to organize themselves? If they feel that their individual research priorities are more important than organizing for greater protections against sexual harassment or whatever-- that's something that can be voted on!
- nickff 3y agoNo, this is not a trivial problem, it is more like a prisoner's dilemma. A great majority of union members can agree that there should be a strike in favor of greater protections, remuneration, or benefits, but it is still in each of their individual interests to continue to work for their own benefits. Put differently, they each want the collective to strike, while continuing their own work. I suspect that a 'strike' would involve most/all of the members delaying submission of findings, but continuing any work that was 'low visibility' (i.e. didn't require outside resources).
- EatingWithForks 3y agoI mean, the article explicitly states that as federal employees they may not strike. So I presume there are other things they will plan, such as public demonstrations.