6 ms·
Kinda unimpressive since it seems that it's just mac studio with pci-e expansion
by mciancia 3y ago
Kinda unimpressive since it seems that it's just mac studio with pci-e expansion
- ganoushoreilly 3y agoMore so given the drivers issue.. I expect OWC and a few companies like AVID will develop proper tools for their hardware but all in it's not going to be nearly as approachable. Also the limit of 192gb on Unified Memory might still be an issue too. We'll see what happens with release, but as someone with two Intel Mac Pros in use, not quite sure I see a reason to switch still (though my laptop is the M1 Air released 2 years ago).
- BXlnt2EachOther 3y agoSince they've now completed the transition to Apple Silicon, I wonder if that starts the timer on deprecating MacOS Intel compatibility. Though plenty media industry users especially stay on older OSes for stability.
- ganoushoreilly 3y agoIt's bound to happen soon enough. I noticed under the dev portal (as of yesterday) the only Mac OS beta for Sonoma was for the M series processors .
- BXlnt2EachOther 3y agoConfig/pricing pages are open now, and it looks like the Pro does match the higher-end Studio configuration. The upgrade choices and prices match too, so they top out at the same spec. Minus the tiny detail of PCIe expansion of course. Pro has a few more ports (extra HDMI and 10GbE, couple more TB4s) as well.
- digitallyfree 3y agoIt also doesn't have ECC as well which was a staple of the previous Mac Pro line.
- JohnBooty 3y agoI wonder if on-die RAM is less susceptible to memory errors? I suspect that it is. Feels like less can go wrong. You have physically shorter interconnects, and the RAM is perhaps more of a known quantity relative to $SOME_RANDOM_MANUFACTURERS_DIMMS. But that is only a guess. However, I don't know if that's true. I guess it's not necessarily more resistant to random cosmic rays or whatever.