4 ms·
Two of those 3 sound intentional: selective exclusion of data and unconventional weighting. The "coding errors" may also have been intentional. I would suggest
by listenallyall 3y ago
Two of those 3 sound intentional: selective exclusion of data and unconventional weighting. The "coding errors" may also have been intentional. I would suggest more scrutiny of the authors and their motives before dismissing as "Excel errors, whoops"
- whimsicalism 3y agoHere was their response FWIW [0] [0]: https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/04/17/business/17economix-response.html https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013...
- idiotsecant 3y agowow, that sure does make me come away with a different opinion than I had just reading the other posts above. Thanks for taking the time to find this.