3 ms·
It's correct that there are Intel chips that last as long as ARM macs. However, AFAIK there are none that compare to M1/M2 in terms of efficiency and relative
by moritzwarhier 3y ago
It's correct that there are Intel chips that last as long as ARM macs.
However, AFAIK there are none that compare to M1/M2 in terms of efficiency and relative performance.
I might be wrong - I'm comparing an old budget ThinkPad (L580) to 2021 and 2023 MacBook Pros here.
Noteworthy for me is that this 2019 i5 with 16GB (Lenovo L580) still trashes all AMD notebooks that I ever used in that regard.
Xubuntu lasted me a work day easily on that machine.
But performance was slow of course.
Even in single thread tasks in interpreted languages, the speed difference between that 2019 i5 and an M1 Pro is around factor 5-10, with the Mac inaudible compared to the i5 sounding like a small airplane (cough, legacy webpack frontend build).
Also here, my experiences are probably distorted by price range differences.
Then there's all the stuff that really matters: virtually unlimited multitasking, reliability (wireless, graphics especially), trackpad, speakers, WebRTC, etc etc
And with a current MBP, you really need to do very expensive tasks (ML, huge builds etc) to notice any performance or battery life degradation.
- garciasn 3y agoI had a 13" MBP with the last Intel chips and no whatever bar. I got at most 4 hours of battery life during the work day. I now have a 2022 M2 13" and I can go 10+ hours w/o a charge doing normal work shit which generally includes 4-6 hours of video chat and 2-4 hours of development. For me, the upgrade was well worth it. I now treat my computer like I do my phone; I charge it once a day overnight.
- w0m 3y ago10h would be nice. Depends on workload significantly I bet; any x86 emulation likely tanks it. 6h of video processing is seriously impressive though.