> I can't imagine a company being so successful and so influential being badly run. I'd argue this is a failure of imagination more than an endorsement of Twit

> I can't imagine a company being so successful and so influential being badly run. I'd argue this is a failure of imagination more than an endorsement of Twitter. Twitter has inertia - it's going to keep going until it literally can't, and that doesn't mean it's been run well. It's been chaotic there since acquisition, with major policies being changed on a whim and then retracted and whole functions of the company disappearing entirely or almost entirely. Major news outlets are dropping their twitter presence, and stocks have dropped - if you define that as "good" management, what would bad management even look like?