What about we first find out how much of it is actually toxic (which seems rather 1/1000th of current official numbers) and then start using them in processes w

What about we first find out how much of it is actually toxic (which seems rather 1/1000th of current official numbers) and then start using them in processes which actually respects that? It still doesn't cover accumulation in bodies over time though. You don't gain any longterm competitive advantage by poisoning half of your population, giving them wonderful cancers, infertility, massive amount of birth defects etc. You just destroy society and bankrupt medical insurance. This isn't some economics and plying with abstract numbers, these are people out there and messing this up badly will have massive negative impacts for many generations.