4 ms·

Wouldn't the output of that be just a horizontal saw tooth graph?

• rjmunro 3y ago
  I'm not sure what you mean by that. Assuming you mostly get a different driver each time, in a fairly random order, drivers who give better experiences would rise to the top. Drivers who give worse experiences would fall to the bottom. You may have to do some adjustment to account for the fact that most drivers are more likely to be in certain areas, so less likely to be compared with drivers further away. Something like the algorithm they use for ranking chess players could maybe help here.
  • jaclaz 3y ago
    I mean, let's use a "proper" range 1 to 10. Your first ride is a 6 (average, sufficient but nothing to talk about), you "upvote" him. Your second one is a 7 (so better than your first one) and you then "upvote" him. Your third one is a 8 (better than your first one) and you then "upvote" him. Your fourth one is a 7 (worse than your last one, but exactly as the second one) but you "downvote" him. Drivers #2 and #4 were at the same level, but one got an "upvote" and one got a "downvote".
    • rjmunro 3y ago
      From me one got an "upvote" and one got a "downvote", but from all customers on average they would get a similar number of "upvotes" and "downvotes". (You can't "upvote" your first driver as you have no comparison)