3 ms·
The analogy is fine but it doesn’t address the issue people are having with AI stuff. When you zoom in enough there’s always ambiguity on the definition, today
by mrtksn 3y ago
The analogy is fine but it doesn’t address the issue people are having with AI stuff.
When you zoom in enough there’s always ambiguity on the definition, today we can’t even define what is life and at what point exactly it starts or ends however we have birthdays and cemeteries since the beginning of the civilization.
The philosophical discussion is nice and useful but when it comes to policies it’s better to address the practical issues.
The difference between photography and AI generated content is that the “metry” part is light on substance I AI.
There’s this Swedish artist who build a “camera” which is a device that looks like camera but doesn’t have any lens or something, instead generates an image based on the location and weather data.
Take a look: https://www.creativeapplications.net/objects/paragraphica-context-to-image-ai-camera/ https://www.creativeapplications.net/objects/paragraphica-co...
So yeah, the philosophical discussion is there and has plenty of meant to chew :)
- mensetmanusman 3y agoWe also have laws around cameras and complex discussions around how the ownership plays out when images of famous people are taken, or images of possibly inappropriate content are generated. I think we would've headed down the wrong path if we would've said from the beginning that cameras own the output.