3 ms·
It's too bad that the author is getting dragged in these replies. They decided to avoid a dependency on docker among other things, and more power to them. The a
by jollyllama 3y ago
It's too bad that the author is getting dragged in these replies. They decided to avoid a dependency on docker among other things, and more power to them. The author could create a system that's stable for 20 years, with no updates. Docker will almost certainly force you to update, it probably even has to reach external servers and will brick past a certain point if you don't update it. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't be suprised.
The author will almost certainly have less of their own maintenance to do since they are not beholdent to updates from dependencies than if they had gone with the more "well-supported" solution.
As long as they document it properly, it could work well for decades. Probably for longer than home assistant will be supported.