3 ms·
I'm using them precisely to make packages available for them, so I don't think it's fair at all to say they're unusable. The OS is fully, 100% supported, so we
by johnklos 3y ago
I'm using them precisely to make packages available for them, so I don't think it's fair at all to say they're unusable.
The OS is fully, 100% supported, so we're not even talking about that. See:
http://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/arm/ http://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/arm/
The number of packages available is decent and is only improving:
https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/earmv4/ https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/earmv4/
- moffkalast 3y agoAh I'm not talking about NetBSD there specifically, mainly Ubuntu and Debian since that's what I typically use. But in general the OS support isn't very good.
- johnklos 3y agoYou're replying to a post about NetBSD ;) Your statement, "But in general the OS support isn't very good," would be better framed as "But in general the Linux OS support isn't very good," because OS support for pre-earmv7hf and pre-aarch64 is excellent in NetBSD.
- moffkalast 3y agoYep, I think we understand each other now.