The million dollar question is why not give Ukraine the means to switfly end the war? One might say it's in order to prevent excessive escalation and slowly bl

The million dollar question is why not give Ukraine the means to switfly end the war? One might say it's in order to prevent excessive escalation and slowly bleed out Russia, but, aside from the fact that "slowly bleeding out" Russia means sacrificing tens of thousands of Ukrainians and further destroying Ukraine along the way, does anyone really think that Russia won't escalate things anyway once they realize they are slowly losing? Since I don't believe it's to prevent escalation, I must conclude it's because more death and destruction bring more business. The longer the conflict goes on the more weapons and ammo are sold, the more Ukrainian cities are destroyed the more money is to be made out of reconstruction. At the very least the incentive is there, and if you ask me any system where death and destruction are incentivized is by definition antihuman.