3 ms·
It's the checking later bit that can cause issues. You need to be able to (ideally) treat compilation as a dynamic schedule rather than a static list of passes
by mhh__ 3y ago
It's the checking later bit that can cause issues.
You need to be able to (ideally) treat compilation as a dynamic schedule rather than a static list of passes.
- moonchild 3y agoD needs to do that because it's weird. I don't see why c would, in order to have forward references. It doesn't do inference or have any fancy compile time features.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- mhh__ 3y agoI guess but allow me to nudge towards the more interesting problem rather than just writing 1 more ISO C compiler with a slight modification.