3 ms·
As an addendum, to not (I hope) distract from the point about spam -- I don't at all object to using an LLM for inspiration, or editing, or summarisation. So l
by andrewaylett 3y ago
As an addendum, to not (I hope) distract from the point about spam -- I don't at all object to using an LLM for inspiration, or editing, or summarisation. So long as there's no claim that the output contains more information than the input. Any statement of fact in the output should be present in the prompt or validated by a human before publishing, or it's suspect. And if it's published without disclosing the lack of validation, it's unethical.
- shagie 3y ago> And if it's published without disclosing the lack of validation, it's unethical. How is this different than people posting things that they didn't test themselves? try {code block} Hope this helps Answers that are clearly not an answer are edited to be pretty rather than down voted and flagged because they're wrong ( https://stackoverflow.com/a/76402243 https://stackoverflow.com/a/76402243 ). The problem isn't an LLM (though that just provides more scale) - its that incorrect information isn't removable / actionable on SO. If the person tried to answer a question it remains up.
- andrewaylett 3y agoWho says it's not different?