4 ms·
Would paying for such upgrades for people who cannot afford them be considered cost effective carbon dioxide removal?
by iinnPP 3y ago
Would paying for such upgrades for people who cannot afford them be considered cost effective carbon dioxide removal?
- master-lincoln 3y agono, because it does not remove carbon dioxide, but prevent future emissions.
- Reason077 3y agoIsn't the net result the same? Is it better to pay (for example) $500 to remove a tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, or to pay $100 to prevent the same amount of CO2 from being emitted in the first place? If CO2 removal costs us more than emissions reduction technologies, isn't it a false economy?