4 ms·
any of which offer everything you've outlined They don't, that's the "problem". Off the top of my head dependency management in Go is not best in class to pu
by inferiorhuman 3y ago
any of which offer everything you've outlined
They don't, that's the "problem". Off the top of my head dependency management in Go is not best in class to put it charitably. .NET will tie you more closely to Windows. Sure, mono is a thing but you'll have more packages to choose from and fewer compatibility issues running .NET on Windows.
- foobarbaz33 3y agoMono? 2000 and late called and want their .NET implementation back. Now it's all about the .NET formerly known as "Core".
- Merad 3y agoYour knowledge of the .Net ecosystem is a bit out of date. It's had first class support for mac and linux for 7-8 years now.
- scns 3y agoFirst class support on Linux and Mac with caveats. Zero snark intended.
- Paradigma11 3y agoWeb development for .NET is multiplatform for quite some years now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET Mono is mostly only relevant if you need platform specific capabilities that wont be covered in .NET.