3 ms·
> this article reads almost like people are dying, arguing "consequences can be far-reaching, affecting policy decisions that impact real people". what are thos
by PurpleRamen 3y ago
> this article reads almost like people are dying, arguing "consequences can be far-reaching, affecting policy decisions that impact real people". what are those consequences?
The obvious part would be wrong calculation of emission-trapping. The article mentions co2 quite often. This could mean wrong claims of health-benefits for living areas, or leading to wrong calculations around climate change.
- 2-718-281-828 3y ago> The article mentions co2 quite often. excuse me? it doesn't mention it even once ...
- PurpleRamen 3y agoIs carbon not co2?
- 2-718-281-828 3y agono, carbon is not co2.
- carlmr 3y agoCarbon as in carbon-footprint is CO2. But only because public discourse is very imprecise. If you want to be scientific CO2 contains carbon, but isn't carbon. In this article it doesn't seem to talk about carbon as CO2.