4 ms·
I hate the unpaid moderator model, it generally attracts only the most terminally-online busybodies, and they seem completely detached from the core aims of SO,
by dataengineer56 3y ago
I hate the unpaid moderator model, it generally attracts only the most terminally-online busybodies, and they seem completely detached from the core aims of SO, instead only interested in metadrama.
I don't like it on Reddit and I don't like it on SO. They should pay professional moderators just like Twitter and Facebook.
- pwdisswordfishc 3y ago> the core aims of SO Which are?
- dataengineer56 3y agoA place that gives me answers to common coding questions.
- MauranKilom 3y agoIf the place is filled to the brim with GPT-generated nonsense, how do you plan on finding those answers?
- JackFr 3y agoI think you've hit on something here. I understand very well that it is active moderation which keeps SO from being a toilet of spam and junk. At the same time, in my limited experience SO moderators are petty tyrants, very jealously guarding their tiny domains.
- dataengineer56 3y ago> wI understand very well that it is active moderation which keeps SO from being a toilet of spam and junk. I often wonder about this. I can see how this is true for somewhere like Reddit where lazy memes could overrun any subreddit, but I'm less convinced when it comes to SO. The vast majority of SO moderator actions are on questions that non-mods have already downvoted and reported. These questions could/would be hidden by SO's algorithm anyway. Only new queue lurkers see unpopular questions. I think that SO's moderation could be almost entirely automated and overseen by a small number of professional paid moderators.