4 ms·
Whether a human artist can do this is largely irrelevant to the question of copyright, however. Selling a close copy of another artists’ work (unless they’re lo
by bugglebeetle 3y ago
Whether a human artist can do this is largely irrelevant to the question of copyright, however. Selling a close copy of another artists’ work (unless they’re long dead) would likely be infringement.
- underlipton 3y agoI think the distinction is that you don't arrest someone for merely having the capability of reproducing a work, but after they've reproduced it and attempted to use it in an infringing manner. I don't know how applicable the analogy is given that LLMs don't "think", of course.