3 ms·
It makes me smile that my top-level comment says I would have preferred the ML-version of Rust, while you say you prefer the zero-cost-abstraction version of Ru
by sph 3y ago
It makes me smile that my top-level comment says I would have preferred the ML-version of Rust, while you say you prefer the zero-cost-abstraction version of Rust that's more C++-like.
Indeed in software engineering there is no silver bullet nor a perfect language for everybody :-)
- kaba0 3y agoML-version of Rust would not have been a uniquely interesting language. It targeting the C++-niche is what made it into quite the big name it has become.
- unrealhoang 3y agoThere’s already a ML-version of Rust, it’s Ocaml