It is a crayon license [1], pure and simple. Not to mention that it likely runs afoul of every reasonable definition of open source out there, despite appropria

It is a crayon license [1], pure and simple. Not to mention that it likely runs afoul of every reasonable definition of open source out there, despite appropriating the term. [1]: https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/2011-December/017416.html https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists...