4 ms·
> I too would have loved something more towards ML than C++ I stopped paying attention to the language around 2012-2013 or so when the direction clearly steere
by TurboHaskal 3y ago
> I too would have loved something more towards ML than C++
I stopped paying attention to the language around 2012-2013 or so when the direction clearly steered towards the latter.
You may want to check https://austral-lang.org/ https://austral-lang.org/ out.
- dorian-graph 3y agoI was about to ask if there's any "Rust by ML" languages out there. Thank you.
- noelwelsh 3y agoO'Caml is heading in that direction. Jane Street are adding more control over memory layout and allocation, and multicore finally arrived recently.
- gautamcgoel 3y agoLol there's no apostrophe in OCaml - it's not an Irish name like, say, O'Brian.
- noelwelsh 3y agoYou're rude and you're ignorant of OCaml's history. There is no apostrophe in OCaml now, but there used to be. E.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20050207032955/http://www.ocaml.org/ https://web.archive.org/web/20050207032955/http://www.ocaml.... OCaml is / was short for Objective Caml. Hence the name used to have an apostrophe. At some point that was dropped.
- bpbp-mango 3y agonull type :(
- TylerE 3y agoNim is the closest to what I had originally hoped Rust would be. Especially Nim 2 with the new GC is really exciting. I suspect it will outperform all but the best hand tuned allocators. It's even hard real time capable, which makes it potentially viable in scenarios like games where GC traditionally hasn't been.