The site confuses permanent and "we don't really know if permanent" removal technologies. The latter are a lot cheaper, but it's really deceptive. I don't thin

The site confuses permanent and "we don't really know if permanent" removal technologies. The latter are a lot cheaper, but it's really deceptive. I don't think this helps the field. "We turned carbon into rock" is really a whole different thing from "we put carbon into the soil and hope it stays there fingers crossed". (Update: Here is some background why some of those methods are sketchy https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/07/soil-revolution-climate-change/619611/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/07/soil-rev... )