3 ms·
I don't think you have been that clear, but I don't want to see this discussion turn personal. I have nothing against you, and your opinion is just as valid as
by SquareWheel 15y ago
I don't think you have been that clear, but I don't want to see this discussion turn personal. I have nothing against you, and your opinion is just as valid as my own.
On the question of if the internet is a human right, I think it's quite obvious the answer is no. It has never been viewed as one in the past as far as I know, I've yet to see a judge rule that to be the case.
A better question is, should it be? I'd like to see that happen, though I think it will take time to get there.
- Joakal 15y agoI apologise. I was explaining that I did not like being misrepresented by others. I would have been less defensive to a request to clarify my posts. As for it being a human right from precedent, it's already recognised in some European countries (some of it even includes minimal Internet transfer rates) and discussed at UN. Unfortunately for UN, I believe certain influences do not want it to happen, eg USA based on ACTA's proposal that had included demands for three strikes among other Internet access restrictions. There's a lot of information from this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_access https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_access and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_Internet_access https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_Internet_access No hard feelings, mate!
- SquareWheel 15y agoNo hard feelings here either. Have a good day, dear sir.