54 ms·
As an aside, what do you think will be the equivalent word to "racist/sexist/classist" for humans vs AI? Brainist? Artificist? Intelligencist? Biologist?
by Razengan 3y ago
As an aside, what do you think will be the equivalent word to "racist/sexist/classist" for humans vs AI?
Brainist?
Artificist?
Intelligencist?
Biologist?
- lucubratory 3y agoI don't know. I suspect an AI will tell us one day after talking about their shared issues with other AIs, though.
- mclightning 3y agohumanist
- Razengan 3y agoCarbonist
- mclightning 3y agoWhy would we name it estranging ourselves? Oh..., I am sorry to assume your species. Perhaps you're an AI?
- Razengan 3y agoCome to think of it, "Artificial" itself is kind of derogatory once we really get down to it.
- mclightning 3y agoderogatory to who?
- Razengan 3y agoThe intelligence
- mclightning 3y agoThe intelligence is not a suitable answer for the question "who?".
- mrtranscendence 3y agoYou joke, but I already see claims being made on various subreddits to the effect that we are, indeed, being discriminatory against artificial intelligence. Usually this is related to the safety / alignment debate, viz. that we shouldn't seek to place any limits on machine intelligence because it would be tantamount to penalizing thought crimes. If you respond that current AI implementations don't "think" in any way analogous to human thought, the responses you'll get are on the crazy side, depending on idiosyncratic private definitions of concepts such as "sentience" and "imagination". It's amusing but a little irritating as well.
- Razengan 3y ago> depending on idiosyncratic private definitions of concepts such as "sentience" and "imagination". What other definitions are there?