3 ms·
So you’re saying that contributions, which are paid for by the employer, result in predictable and proportional payouts after some vesting period. I see. So wh
by abduhl 3y ago
So you’re saying that contributions, which are paid for by the employer, result in predictable and proportional payouts after some vesting period.
I see. So why shouldn’t it be considered a part of total compensation?
The rest of the benefits not being included in TC I agree with.
- woodruffw 3y agoI realized I made a mistake in this thread: I'm conflating TC and take-home, when my point really only applies to take-home. Sorry for that! You're right that pension benefits can be reasonably included in a TC calculation; I'd still argue that the article's framing is meant to imply that TC here reflects a larger take-home than it actually does, as well as malfeasance on SF's part (rather than ordinary and boring funding obligations).