3 ms·
I agree we should either get rid of, or very least overhaul copyright. However, the line in the sand I draw is giving any kind of human-based rights to ML or A
by spacephysics 3y ago
I agree we should either get rid of, or very least overhaul copyright.
However, the line in the sand I draw is giving any kind of human-based rights to ML or AI. People already are thinking ChatGPT is close to human intelligence, and we know we haven’t even seen what’s truly possible.
My fear is the typical oversimplification of complex technology will lend us to giving human rights to programs, and lead to a whole host of issues.
We need to stop anthropomorphizing technology until we really hit a philosophical quandary. Giving in too early will just give power to less-than-polished tech and either slow down research, or further drain a country’s resources
- stale2002 3y ago> the sand I draw is giving any kind of human-based rights to ML or AI. Ok, but this isn't about giving rights to AI. Instead this is about given rights to humans to use AI. If you make a law about this stuff, at the end of the day, it all trickles down to allowing or disallow human actions.