Nirvana fallacy is only true when the argument is completely implausible, like "when humans sprout wings, we won't need airplanes anymore." However, the article

Nirvana fallacy is only true when the argument is completely implausible, like "when humans sprout wings, we won't need airplanes anymore." However, the article is making the valid point that copyright is just a social construct. It is not something physical, like wings, and under a different culture and/or political system it might be unnecessary.