3 ms·
>State-enforced copyright came about with the Statute of Anne in 1710. It was the result lobby of a group English publishers who sought to regain their monopoly
by marcinzm 3y ago
>State-enforced copyright came about with the Statute of Anne in 1710. It was the result lobby of a group English publishers who sought to regain their monopoly on publishing. Handing out the initial copyright to the authors was a political gesture: the goal has always been to get authors to hand over the copyright to the publisher, effectively giving the publisher a monopoly.
This is confusing. It's a political gesture and yet people wanted it enough to value that gesture. So clearly some people wanted to protect authors. Plus a whole social system has been built on top of copyright over the last 300 years and that matters a lot more than whatever a bunch of rich people in the 1700s thought.
>In most countries, copyright holds for 70 years after the death of the author. Such a long-term copyright cannot possibly be meant to protect authors.
Supporting one's family is a major goal of many people.
Ets, etc.
- bentley 3y ago> Supporting one's family is a major goal of many people. I’m sympathetic to the idea of providing some means of posthumous support to an author’s widow and children. I’m rather less sympathetic when it manifests as an exclusive monopoly lasting well into the lifetime of the third, fourth, or even fifth generation of descendants.
- marcinzm 3y agoSure but that's different than saying a creator gets no benefit from it.
- WalterBright 3y ago> Supporting one's family is a major goal of many people. I inherited my dad's copyrights. The annual royalties might pay for a movie ticket.